We have previously written about the importance of undertaking investor relations. Here, we look at why you might want to consider engaging an agency to assist you with investor relations.
 
When marketing your business to investors, you can opt for in-house investor relations expertise, you can look to outsourcing to a specialist communication agency with investor relations expertise or you can use a blend of the two. Managing and controlling external opinion about your business can often be the difference between success and failure, with significant upside potential if communication strategies are implemented successfully.
 
Here are five compelling reasons to opt for an agency.
 
1. Focus

 A consultancy’s prime focus is communication and stakeholder relations. Through focusing on specific tasks and skills, the agency develops considerable expertise that is hard to replicate in-house. Through deeply focusing on its activities, the consultancy is able to improve its specialist knowledge and enhance its abilities. In addition, a company which needs to build in-house capacity risks losing focus on its primary business.
 
2. Improved communication and greater trust
 
An investor relations consultancy can manage expectations proactively through ensuring consistency of message and ongoing communication. This results in better stakeholder relations and improved interaction. Trust is built between the entities when there is greater information flow and improved quality and integrity of disclosure. And establishing and maintaining trust is one of the key issues that face corporate executives. Trust means more accurate pricing of a company’s shares and it means more stable and confident investors. Greater transparency leads to less disruptive investors and better relationships.
 
3. External perspective

 A consultancy has the ability to step back and view a situation from the outside, providing an independent point of view, the ability to “see the wood from the trees” as well as looking holistically at the business and the work that it does. It’s easy to get tunnel-vision when working within a company. It can be challenging for employees to view things differently or objectively, to raise new ideas or concerns from the inside, especially if they might fear for their jobs.
 
4. Leverage relationships

With an intense knowledge of and relationships with the media, an external consultancy will be able to leverage those relationships across different clients. A specialist agency is able to identify and engage with the most appropriate media for a particular story and knows how to manage the media.
In our consultancy, for example, we find that the media often approaches us to source input for an article or a spokesperson for an interview because we have a range of clients. We effectively become a one-stop shop for the media, obtaining content from a variety of sources for them.
 
5. Cost
 
For the equivalent of – or even less than – a modestly paid employee, a client has access to an entire team that can move the needle on important projects. Each team member brings different skills and backgrounds to the table and an agency will provide strategic input, planning and management skills. This, together with innovation and fresh insights, can be secured for the business at a far lower cost than could be achieved in-house.
 
Finally
 
There are, of course, also benefits to maintaining in-house capabilities and often the most successful campaigns are the result of bringing together a strong internal team and a great agency. While this may not always be an option, especially for a smaller company, having a quality, professional agency on board is the best option.
 
We’d love to have your thoughts on the internal/agency debate.

Communicators need to be aware that companies today are trying to achieve more with fewer people, which means that everyone is overstretched and short of time.

When communicating with them, get to the point as quickly as possible. Nobody has time to wade through a mass of your opinions.

If you have something to say, say it in as few words as possible.

Economic downturns are a fact of business life. However, those businesses that maintain a public profile – that stay in the public eye – are the ones that will have the best chance of surviving an economic downturn.
 
Hunkering down and waiting for the bad times to pass may not be the best approach so here are 5 tips to help your business ride it out.

1. Don’t panic – if you let panic take over, you won’t be able to respond rationally and constructively to the situation. Panic, largely emotional, has the power to destroy. You’ll lose the battle if you allow yourself to panic. You cannot afford to throw your hands in the air or to become paralysed by the fear of the situation. Take control. Take stock of where you are, what your strengths and weaknesses are and from there you can begin to build a solid strategy for your business to outlive and outlast a tough economic patch.
    
2. Spend wisely – while it might be tempting, don’t abandon your marketing spend. Rather look for ways that will maximise that spend, ways to amplify your messages through below-the-line and social media marketing and brand building. Box smarter, not harder. Use content marketing and storytelling to connect with your customers – people always relate to stories. Use online media to increase your visibility and forge relationships with your audience. You could also start a blog, write a newsletter and find other online ways to interact with customers.
    
3. Use the powerful multiplier effect of public relations – PR can be a high-reach tool to access your customers and other key stakeholders. The narrative generated by PR can reach your investors, partners and clients to create brand awareness and interest. PR is able to build credibility and leverage marketing spend. If you can’t afford an agency, establish who the key journalists in your field are and connect with them directly. If you go this route, be careful not to oversell your offering and always respect their deadlines.
    
4. Keep your message on target – this will help to position your business exactly where you want it to be. Focus on the positives of your offering – quality, excellence, stability, durability – whatever enables you to stand out from your competitors and makes your offering unique and valuable. Showcase the benefits of your product or services and present these from the perspective of your customer. Let them know the value that you add, not about discounts, in order to build a sustainable business that will survive the downturn and thrive during the upturn.
    
5. Focus on quality – quality is always a successful strategy; it’s what lasts the distance and wins in the long term. Never give up on producing quality. Don’t drop prices – focus on what sets you apart, what makes your product or service worth the extra cost. Price cutting is a race to the bottom that no-one wins. Stay firm, stay strong and build a solid base for the upturn, which will surely follow the downturn.

 
If others around you are cutting their marketing spend while you retain yours, you will be ahead of the curve when the economy turns, leaving them to play catch-up.
 
Invest in the future now and it will enable you to perform better later on.

We can take two important lessons from the December 2017 Steinhoff accounting scandal.

 1. When a crisis hits, the results can be sudden and spectacular

 Warren Buffett is widely quoted as saying: “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it.” There is no such thing as overnight success, but there certainly is overnight failure.
 
In the case of Steinhoff, the company was in the making for 50 years. It had reached the Top 40 on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, making it one of the 40 largest market cap shares on the bourse. The price peaked at over R95 in 2016. From November that year to October 2017, it traded in a relatively narrow band between R60 and R70.
 
In November 2017, it broke below R60 but the real damage came during December 2017. The share began the month on R55.81, lost R10 in two days and then plunged 61% the following day. In the first five trading days of the month, the Steinhoff share price fell 89%. And it has yet to recover.
 
Once a crisis takes hold, the reputational damage can be swift and ruthless.
 
2. You can’t communicate enough
 
Alec Hogg put it succinctly when looking at the disaster, saying that “… when a crisis hits, you simply cannot over-communicate. Steinhoff’s response has been an almost perfect inversion. Since detonating that sparsely worded bomb last Wednesday, the company has issued just two short statements. In the two previous months it had published eight strong denials of allegations which now appear to be true.”
 
He’s quite correct. When a business (or any other entity) is in a crisis, the first thing that needs to be done is to communicate with stakeholders. This is Crisis Communication 101. Silence merely creates a void in which speculation becomes rife and once that happens, it becomes increasingly hard to separate the facts from the fiction. The “fake news” phenomenon likes nothing more than a lack of information in which to breed. Even a month after the crisis broke, the board did little to clarify or elaborate on the situation for stakeholders, resulting in the share price languishing at about 5% of its peak for the month.
 
Preserve your reputation

Reputations are precious and need to be managed. Negative headlines can – and do – impact the bottom line. Take some time to review your reputation management practices and incorporate issue management protocols, procedures and guidelines within them.
 
What other lessons does this crisis offer us?

Although communicating with all stakeholders is enshrined in the King IV Code of Corporate Governance, there has been some spectacular bungling by companies of their communication with the investment community. In a world where confidence in the corporate sector has been eroded by dramatic failures there is clearly the need to create an understanding of a company’s affairs by investors.
 
In 2003 Nedcor’s reputation suffered an enormous dent and a plummeting share price. After touching giddy highs of R150.00 in 2002, Nedcor shares tumbled to the R60 level in 2004. A bonus scheme focusing on short-term performance saw bonuses of R18m paid to directors in 2002, in respect of the 2001 financial year – a year in which the group earned net profits of only R13m. A press exposé saw heads roll. Rob Rose summed it up in Business Day (9 Dec 2003): “New CEO Tom Boardman will take over the reins today and attempt to restore the bank to prosperity after a traumatic year, in which its share price dropped 40% amid a slump in its earnings and reputation.”
 
When BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in Gulf of Mexico on 20 April 2010 causing an oil spill, BP's share price was 648.20p (GB). At first, CEO Tony Hayward tried to downplay the impact of the disaster on both the company and the environment, stating that the impact will be “very, very modest”.
 
By 30 May, Hayward had reached a nadir in his media engagement stating: “I’d like my life back.” From this point, there would be no going back for him. By 29 June, the price had collapsed to 298p. Throughout the crisis, Hayward seemed overly defensive and revealed little. It came as no surprise when his resignation was announced on 27 July, in spite of the leak being successfully capped earlier in July. The share price never really rose above 500p after the incident, in spite of the then booming oil price and a subsequent collapse in oil has seen the share price slide to below 350p.
 
And who can forget the rout that Pinnacle Holdings experienced in March 2014? After peaking at over R26.00 in August 2013, the share price drifted to around R23.00 towards the end of February 2014. The arrest of an executive director for alleged bribery in March 2014, saw the share close at R13.90 on 30 March 2014 and by mid-August, the share was trading below R10.00. In the two days after the announcement, Pinnacle’s market cap fell to R1.95bn, from R3.4bn — a total loss of R1.5bn.
 
But the issue was not so much the arrest – the charges were subsequently dropped – as the communication vacuum in which it took place. It took Pinnacle 20 days to announce the arrest, during which time several directors sold Pinnacle shares equivalent to about 1% of the company. And even once the announcement was made, management seemed reluctant to have much interaction with the media. In spite of an uptick following the charges being dropping, Pinnacle’s share price continues to languish in the R11.00 to R14.00 range.
 
By contrast, the handling of the Pick ‘n Pay poison scare in 2003 resulted in a relatively small impact on both the share price and company sales, in spite of a decision to keep silent on the matter for seven weeks. Once the company went public, CEO Sean Summers handled media attention with aplomb: always available, always proving information and keeping the public informed. Shareholders rewarded the strategy with a share price that held its own, only dipping 3.6% in the week after the announcement, after reaching an all-time high the previous week. Not only that, but some customers were actually going out of their way to shop at Pick ‘n Pay as a means to support the group: in a survey at the time, 87% of all respondents polled indicated that they would support Pick ‘n Pay and would make a point of shopping there.
 
What is clear from these case studies is that investor sentiment plays an enormous role in determining share prices. An open channel of communication with investors is essential to keep them well informed and able to base investment decisions on facts rather than speculation and it behooves a company to undertake sound investor relations.
 
It is in a company’s interests to maintain a share price that is consistent with an accurate view of its performance as well as its future prospects: too low and the company is an easy target for a takeover while making fund raising expensive and inhibiting its ability to purchase other entities; too high and the risk of shorting and lack of appeal for new share options hamper the company.
 
Engaging with shareholders may be a JSE listing requirement and important from a governance perspective, but it is equally important for keeping shareholders well informed and in the best position possible to make investment decisions.

*This article first appeared in "Directorship", the official publication of the Institute of Directors Southern Africa

It’s time to ban the word “publicist” from the PR lexicon. And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of the term “spin doctor” too. Neither expression does the profession any good.

Seeking “publicity” implies that there is no strategy underlying the efforts, there is no messaging being undertaken – it is publicity at all costs, no matter that the reputation of an individual or brand may be tarnished or not. It implies a complete lack of strategic intervention and conjures up the Oscar Wilde quote: “The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.”

Michael Shea, a career diplomat and press secretary to Britain’s Elizabeth II, has been credited with coining the term “spin doctor” when describing his role as press secretary as that of a "quasi-spin doctor". But, creating “spin” implies manipulating the facts to suit the business or individual which, in turn, suggests dishonesty and an attempt to control the news.
 
Newsflash – the adage “there’s no such thing as bad publicity” is, in fact, a fallacy. There are MANY examples of bad publicity being just that: bad publicity.
 
We only have to look at some recent examples in South African social media – such as Penny Sparrow’s racist comments on Facebook and Gareth Cliff’s efforts to defend free speech. Both have been the subject of bad news and tarnished reputations. The latter is suing his erstwhile client M-Net for R25m, for firing him (or cancelling his contract). Even if Cliff were to win his court battle, his reputation has suffered irreparable harm and is unlikely to have the same value as before. He will need to hope that people have short memories if he wishes to rebuild his career.
 
And note, it does not matter if Cliff is not guilty of being a racist – the perception has been created and he will struggle to shake it.
 
PR practitioners who describe themselves as publicists do the industry no favours. PR involves adopting a holistic, strategic approach to managing a reputation. It involves assessing the essence of a brand (and, yes, people can be brands) and creating a framework within which a brand interacts with its stakeholders. Managing a reputation entails aligning the general perceptions about a brand with its real DNA. It means being truthful with stakeholders, having an open and honest conversation with them. And it also means listening to them.
 
Reputation management involves identifying other people’s attitudes toward a brand – how they feel and what they say – and aiming to ensure that the general consensus is in line with the brand’s reality across all publics.
 
PR and reputation management needs to be carefully thought through, two-way strategic communication. It shouldn’t be any other way.

I would love to hear your comments on this.

Sitting in a radio studio with a client being interviewed, our host pointed to a box on the wall displaying the words “ON AIR”. He explained that when illuminated with its red backlight, whatever we said in the studio would be broadcast to the nation. We continued with light banter until he called out “on air” and, as the sign lit up, we quickly quietened down and the formal interview began. 

But the reality is, we are permanently connected – in this switched on world which we inhabit, we are always “ON AIR”. Whatever is posted onto the internet, can live on forever. Once it has been committed to the web, it is public. And even if it is retracted, it remains available. The internet never forgets anything.

 Even if you delete your post swiftly, someone is likely to haves captured it and it will live on. Posts can be swiftly copied to services like Storify or Chirpstory meaning that deleting them from your timeline doesn’t necessarily remove them from the internet. And, while anything you delete may not appear on your timeline, the items are cached on Google and picked up by other aggregators such as topsy. Freezepage keeps an accurate image of a webpage at a moment in time – ensuring that as pages changes, they can still be recalled as they were.

The increasingly popular Snapchat (especially among the youth), indicates that the pictures sent this way are deleted within 10 seconds. But don’t be fooled. Although the pictures (snaps) and the chats disappear to view, they remain on the internet and on your android phone, albeit hidden from viewand and on your android phone, albeit hidden from view.and on your android phone, albeit hidden from view.and on your android phone, albeit hidden from view.and on your android phone, albeit hidden from view.and on your android phone, albeit hidden from view.and on your android phone, albeit hidden from view.

And this issue is not limited to the social media. Last year’s Postmates spat highlights this beautifully. Dissatisfied with Postmates’ service, a client wrote a letter of complaint. At some stage in dealing with the complaint, the CEO outlined a resolution to the customer’s issue, ending it with “Someone also please tell her to f*** off.” Unfortunately for Postmates and its CEO, this line was included in the response to the unhappy client.

Closer to home, Primedia may have deleted the controversial clown cartoon, but I bet you have seen it elsewhere. A quick Google search will yield any number of copies of it displayed on the internet.

You don’t even need to post something onto the internet yourself. The power of the smartphone means that anyone within earshot or within a line of sight, can broadcast your words and your actions very swiftly. Just ask Charles Saatchi. And we all know that ended in tears.

Once stated, your words exist. Once posted to the web, an item exists and removing it does not mean it hasn’t existed. No matter how swiftly you delete, no matter how humbly you apologise, the offending item will persist. It’s better not to post it, say it or do it in the first place. Reputation is everything and you shouldn’t take risks with it.

So the bottom line is that you are always “ON AIR”. You can’t escape this and you need to be very aware whenever you post something or say something. It will form a part of your reputation. Forever.

What are your thoughts about the need to watch your words and actions?